Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 27.06.2025 09:09

Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
How does Bollywood influence Indian culture?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Scientists identify a cellular 'switch' that could reverse type 2 diabetes - Earth.com
What’s next?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Thank you.
How can someone get patrons on Patreon if they are a beginner artist?
Let’s just make it real clear:
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
The man who refused to die, and came back from his death 6 times - Times of India
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Michigan Cup starting lineup: Chase Briscoe wins third pole in a row - NBC Sports
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Uh-Oh! Switch 2's New GameChat Feature Is Transcribing Bad Words - Nintendo Life